Skip to main content

Writing test items

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7779766352028136965/741475458859702927
Writing test items



Testing is a very important aspect of teaching. According to ''Wilga Rivers'',

"It is a natural step in the educational process so stop. They have a twofold purpose, acting as a guide to the student and a guide to the teacher".
 All tests can be grouped under three categories:

  •  Aptitude test

  • Proficiency tests

  • Achievement tests

The most commonly used classroom tests are achievement tests. ''B.W Robinett'' has called them "scoring tests". They measure how far students have achieved the goals of the instruction; they also evaluate the effectiveness of the instruction. Achievement tests are of two types:

  • Subjective tests
  • Objective tests

They are different from each other in their design and technique

1. Subjective test:


Subjective tests are also called "easy type tests''. Subjective means something personal based on personal feelings and opinions. As such, in these tests, the assessment depends upon the examiner's opinion, judgment, or evolution. They contain items like the description of a person or thing, the narration of an incident, views on some topic. They may be marked differently by different examiners. Moreover, in these tests, questions may have different answers depending on the personal opinion, thoughts, feelings, and knowledge of the students.


Advantages of the subjective test

These tests have some strong points:
  • First, these tests are good to test the ability of the student to organize ideas.
  • Secondly, in a single subjective test, we can test many squares of the language.
  • Thirdly the teacher can judge the range of students' knowledge and the working of his mind.
  • Lastly, there is no element of chance that the student cannot guess the answer.

Disadvantages of subjective tests

There are some limitations of this type of test;

  • First, these are not comprehensive. They cannot be separated over the entire course.
  • Secondly, they are not dependable because in their marking there is an element of subjectivity. So their scoring is unstable. If the same test is given to different examiners for evaluation, the result will be different. Even the same examiner is likely to award different marks to the same script if he is the true market on two different occasions.
  • Lastly, very often easy type questions are constructed carelessly. Sometimes they required too long answers and sometimes too short.

Kinds of subjective tests

Some of the subject tests are as follows
  • The short answer of 2-3 lines to questions.
  • Detailed answers of one or two pages of two questions.
  • Dialogue writing, story writing.
  • Essay writing /paragraph writing.




2. Objective tests

Objective means something which is based on facts, not on personal opinion. Objective tests are so-called because there is objectivity in their marking. Its evaluation does not depend on the personal opinion of the examiner. Moreover in this type of test, to achieve objectivity each question is set in such a way as to have one correct answer. As such the personal opinion of the examiner does not affect the marking.


Kinds of objective tests

These tests include items like
  • True-false exercises
  • Matching
  • Transformation
  • Completion
  • Combination
  • Rearrangement
  • Cloze tests
  • Multiple choice.

Advantages of objective tests

These tests have some strong points.
  • First, they can be separated over the entire course and every item of the syllabus can be tested.
  • Secondly, they are useful for measuring specific skills and items of knowledge separately.
  • Thirdly, they are easy to score. There is no element of value judgment or personal opinion.
  • Lastly, they are reliable because this course is the same whoever may be the examiner.

Disadvantages of objective tests

There are some limitations of this type of test:
  • First, these are very difficult to construct. They need much care and attention. The paper setter to see that only one and one answer is correct.
  • Secondly, they have some scope for chance or luck. An answer can be correct by chance.
  • Lastly, these tests do not test the students' self-expression. They test only recognition and comprehension.

Conclusion

In short, objective and subjective tests are used to designate two types of scoring. Objective tests are those that are scored rather mechanically without the need to evaluate complex performance on a scale. Subjective tests are those that require an opinion, judgment on the part of the examiner. In general subjective tests permit the use of a technique that is natural and seems outwardly very valid. Objective tests have been criticized at times because to reduce the items to mechanical scoring they are rendered outwardly artificial.



Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any doubts, please let me know

Popular posts from this blog

THE INAATE THEORY OR MENTALISTIC THEORY

The Innate theory or Mentalistic theory   The innate theory of language learning was put forward by the most distinguished 20th-century linguist called  ''Noam Chomsky'' . This is also known as the ''mentalistic theory'' or ''nature theory''. This theory is best understood in contrast with the '' Behavioristic '' or '' Nurture theory'' of language learning. The behavioristic theory was put forward by '' Skinner'' in his book work '' Verbal Behavior'' . It is based on the s timulus-response- reinforcement- repetition process. This theory emphasizes the preexistence of an ideal social environment for the learning of one’s mother tongue. It is maintained that language is a sort of behavior that we acquire in ideal socio conditions. The behaviorists do not believe that the child has a separate language learning capability. It was in reaction to this theory that Chomsky came
1 comment
Read more

Difference between Approach Method and Teaching

Difference between Approach Method and Teaching The aim of a good teacher is effective teaching. It yields good results and creates an understanding of new concepts. It is well planned and systematic. It follows some specific methods and employs the best available techniques. For becoming a good teacher, one is curious to know what methods are available and what are the best techniques? The question also arises whether there is some difference between an approach, method, and technique. We can describe these points as follows Approach Method Technique Approach An approach is a set of theories are principles that our teacher may have in mind about the philosophy of language learning and teaching. Method A method is a general process of creative interaction between the subject matter offered by the school and the students. It has an established sequence of doing something, we can say A method is a planned effort. It has an established sequence. It has also an established relationship amo
1 comment
Read more

The direct method

The direct method The general dissatisfaction with the grammar-translation method gave birth to the direct method of teaching. This method claims to teach a foreign language without the use of a mother tongue. It is based on the natural approach that learning a foreign language is the same as learning the mother tongue naturally without the help of any written rules. Its two major aims are: to think in the target language and to speak it with the correct pronunciation. In short, it aims at establishing a direct bond between thought and expression, between experience and language. This method works on four principles; No translation under any circumstances. A strong emphasis on Oral work. Avoidance of grammatical explanation for stop. Maximum use of question-answer techniques Advantages of the direct method: 1.  Natural method: The child learns first by listening and speaking. This method lays stress on this natural way of learning language skills. 2. Fluency in speech: Through exces
1 comment
Read more