Skip to main content

Chomsky theory of language acquisition

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7779766352028136965/5194678031660386366

Chomsky theory of language acquisition

 

 




The marvelous capacity that every individual has been the subject of investigation for centuries. The two important theories put forward in the study of first language acquisition are,

  • Behavioristic theory

  • Innate theory

The behavioristic theory has been presented by ''B.F Skinner'' in his classic work ''Verbal Behavior'' and the Innate theory given by ''Chomsky''.

Background of the theory

The behavioristic theory was first introduced in 1913 by the American psychologist ''John B. Watson''. Watson is credited with coining the term behaviorism. Watson's view was largely influenced by the research of Russian psychologist ''Ivan P. Pavlov'' during the early 1900s. The most influential version of this theory is put forward by ''B.F Skinner'' in 1957. His version of behaviorism is best known as ''Radical Behaviorism''.

Types of behavioral learning

There are two types of behavioral learning

  • Classical conditioning

  • Operant conditioning

1.Classical conditioning:

This conditioning was first described by the Russian psychologist Ivan Pavlov in 1903 through his experiment on dogs. Pavlov presented dogs with food to examine their salivary response. He rang a bell just before serving the food. At first, the dog did not salivate until the food is served. However, when the bell was rung at repeated feedings the sound of the bell alone caused the dogs to salivate. Thus, in classical conditioning, an unconditioned stimulus(food) is paired with a conditioned stimulus (bell).

2.Operant conditioning:

Expanding on Watson's basic stimulus-response model, skinner developed a more comprehensive view of conditioning, known as operant conditioning. Skinner's model was based on the premise that effective language behavior consists of producing responses to the correct stimulus. When a response is followed by a reinforcer then it is conditioned to occur again. The operant condition can be summarized as

Stimulus-response-reinforcement-repetition


Reinforcement and punishment are the core ideas of operant conditioning.

1.Reinforcement:

A reinforcer is a stimulus that increases the frequency of a response it follows;

The act of following response with a reinforcer is called reinforcement.


It can be classified into the following types

  • Positive reinforcement

  • Negative reinforcement

Positive reinforcement:

It is the encouragement of the desired response by a pleasant stimulus.

For example;

If a child produces an utterance that is appropriate to the situation, the mother will be rewarded him /her with some sign of approval. This approval or reward will encourage him to repeat the same response to the same situation.

Negative reinforcement:

It is a discouragement of an undesired response by an unpleasant stimulus.

For example;

If a child produces an utterance that is inappropriate to the situation, the mother will not reward him /her. Thus, the child will not repeat the same response to the same situation.

2.Punishment:

Punishment is used to erase undesirable behaviors by presenting a distressing stimulus when the behavior occurs

Reinforcement can come from different sources. The mother is the primary source of reinforcement because she has to take care of the child almost all the time

Final thought:

The behavioristic theory has also been criticized by many critics. Chomsky launched the bitterest attack on him. He considers skinner's theory inappropriate for explaining the generative aspect of the language. According to him, a child cannot learn something only by imitation and reward. He says a child is born with a mental capacity to establish underlying rules from the jumble of language which is exposed

Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any doubts, please let me know

Popular posts from this blog

THE INAATE THEORY OR MENTALISTIC THEORY

The Innate theory or Mentalistic theory   The innate theory of language learning was put forward by the most distinguished 20th-century linguist called  ''Noam Chomsky'' . This is also known as the ''mentalistic theory'' or ''nature theory''. This theory is best understood in contrast with the '' Behavioristic '' or '' Nurture theory'' of language learning. The behavioristic theory was put forward by '' Skinner'' in his book work '' Verbal Behavior'' . It is based on the s timulus-response- reinforcement- repetition process. This theory emphasizes the preexistence of an ideal social environment for the learning of one’s mother tongue. It is maintained that language is a sort of behavior that we acquire in ideal socio conditions. The behaviorists do not believe that the child has a separate language learning capability. It was in reaction to this theory that Chomsky came

Difference between Approach Method and Teaching

Difference between Approach Method and Teaching The aim of a good teacher is effective teaching. It yields good results and creates an understanding of new concepts. It is well planned and systematic. It follows some specific methods and employs the best available techniques. For becoming a good teacher, one is curious to know what methods are available and what are the best techniques? The question also arises whether there is some difference between an approach, method, and technique. We can describe these points as follows Approach Method Technique Approach An approach is a set of theories are principles that our teacher may have in mind about the philosophy of language learning and teaching. Method A method is a general process of creative interaction between the subject matter offered by the school and the students. It has an established sequence of doing something, we can say A method is a planned effort. It has an established sequence. It has also an established relationship amo

The direct method

The direct method The general dissatisfaction with the grammar-translation method gave birth to the direct method of teaching. This method claims to teach a foreign language without the use of a mother tongue. It is based on the natural approach that learning a foreign language is the same as learning the mother tongue naturally without the help of any written rules. Its two major aims are: to think in the target language and to speak it with the correct pronunciation. In short, it aims at establishing a direct bond between thought and expression, between experience and language. This method works on four principles; No translation under any circumstances. A strong emphasis on Oral work. Avoidance of grammatical explanation for stop. Maximum use of question-answer techniques Advantages of the direct method: 1.  Natural method: The child learns first by listening and speaking. This method lays stress on this natural way of learning language skills. 2. Fluency in speech: Through exces