Skip to main content

what is microteaching

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7779766352028136965/5895046563346385096
what is microteaching






Microteaching is a new concept in the field of education technology. It is called ''micro'' (very small) because;

  • One skill at a time is taught

  • Teaching duration is 7-10 minutes

  • Number of students is 5-10

Micro-teaching is not a teaching method. It is a teacher training program based on self-assessment. The purpose of this program is

''to improve teaching skills by self-practice and self-criticism.''


This method has been used for many years in in-service teacher training courses. It practices and developed specific teaching skills. It is now considered a very effective teacher training technique at the pre-service and in-service levels. In other words,

''Micro-teaching is a procedure in which pupil-teacher practices teaching with a reduced number of pupils in specific skills.''


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7779766352028136965/5895046563346385096
what is microteaching



The cycle of micro-teaching





https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/7779766352028136965/5895046563346385096
cycle of micro-teaching


What are the steps of micro-teaching


A teacher presents a short lesson, after the lesson teaching, a discussion is held on the performance of the student-teacher. In general, the following steps takes place

  • Confidence of the teacher

  • How he starts teaching

  • Students involvement

  • Step vise teaching

  • Use of audio-visual aids

  • Feedback at the spot

The participants offer their opinions as follows

  • Plus, points are appreciated

  • Minus points are singled out

  • Suggestions for improvement are to give

Advantage and disadvantages of micro-teaching

Advantages:

  • Individualized teaching

  • Real teaching takes place

  • The practice of specific task

  • Helps in developing teaching skills

  • lessen complexities of the classroom teaching

Disadvantages

  • The main emphasis is on learning teaching skills, not content.

  • The scope of micro-teaching is narrow.

  • lack of resources

  • lack of experts

  • Not real teaching


The objective of micro-teaching


  • Micro-teaching can initiate the teacher trainees to develop teacher’s behavior under laboratory condition.

  • Microteaching can lessen the workload of peer supervision.

  • Microteaching develops small group instruction skills and pupils thinking to reason, problem-solving creativity, and self-direction.

  • It also makes teachers conscious of developing their skills and strategies to understand their teaching.

  • Microteaching helps teachers to understand the process of teaching and learning.

  • It provides teachers with ample opportunities to explore styles to acquire new teaching skills.

Final thought:



Some people argue that micro-teaching is both a risky and costly procedure. It is because trainees may be exposed to criticism by their colleagues or supervisors. These are also cost involved in both the resources and time that may be used in this process.

Comments

Post a Comment

If you have any doubts, please let me know

Popular posts from this blog

THE INAATE THEORY OR MENTALISTIC THEORY

The Innate theory or Mentalistic theory   The innate theory of language learning was put forward by the most distinguished 20th-century linguist called  ''Noam Chomsky'' . This is also known as the ''mentalistic theory'' or ''nature theory''. This theory is best understood in contrast with the '' Behavioristic '' or '' Nurture theory'' of language learning. The behavioristic theory was put forward by '' Skinner'' in his book work '' Verbal Behavior'' . It is based on the s timulus-response- reinforcement- repetition process. This theory emphasizes the preexistence of an ideal social environment for the learning of one’s mother tongue. It is maintained that language is a sort of behavior that we acquire in ideal socio conditions. The behaviorists do not believe that the child has a separate language learning capability. It was in reaction to this theory that Chomsky came

Difference between Approach Method and Teaching

Difference between Approach Method and Teaching The aim of a good teacher is effective teaching. It yields good results and creates an understanding of new concepts. It is well planned and systematic. It follows some specific methods and employs the best available techniques. For becoming a good teacher, one is curious to know what methods are available and what are the best techniques? The question also arises whether there is some difference between an approach, method, and technique. We can describe these points as follows Approach Method Technique Approach An approach is a set of theories are principles that our teacher may have in mind about the philosophy of language learning and teaching. Method A method is a general process of creative interaction between the subject matter offered by the school and the students. It has an established sequence of doing something, we can say A method is a planned effort. It has an established sequence. It has also an established relationship amo

The direct method

The direct method The general dissatisfaction with the grammar-translation method gave birth to the direct method of teaching. This method claims to teach a foreign language without the use of a mother tongue. It is based on the natural approach that learning a foreign language is the same as learning the mother tongue naturally without the help of any written rules. Its two major aims are: to think in the target language and to speak it with the correct pronunciation. In short, it aims at establishing a direct bond between thought and expression, between experience and language. This method works on four principles; No translation under any circumstances. A strong emphasis on Oral work. Avoidance of grammatical explanation for stop. Maximum use of question-answer techniques Advantages of the direct method: 1.  Natural method: The child learns first by listening and speaking. This method lays stress on this natural way of learning language skills. 2. Fluency in speech: Through exces